data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f12fc/f12fc8ad29af0232d513e452e11c246720c303fe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11397/11397bf02c39ba5c6df98b7a260d1edaea4f7a3f" alt=""
But oddly enough, this is a way of understanding the the use of the much vilified altar rail. The altar rail is considered an extension of the altar of sacrifice. That is why almost always, the top of the rail is made out of the same material as the mensa or top of the high altar (and why people should not sit on it, put pamphlets on it, or in general do anything that one wouldn’t do with the altar.) The faithful who are priests, prophets, and kings by nature of their baptism are called to this extension of the “the Table” as the disciples were gathered around the table of the Last Supper, drawn up to the sanctuary to receive the Body and Blood of Christ from the very table itself. Understood in this way, unless one troops everybody into the sanctuary to gather around the altar, the laity have actually been pushed back further away from the altar with the removal of the rail in so many of our spaces.
My home pastor used to say, “When everybody gets tired of the way we do Mass now, we will have some new iteration that will look strikingly like the past, but will be entirely new and the people who start it will be innovators. Then they too will become old school and someone will come by and change that innovation again.” From architects to laity to clergy; everyone wants everyone to be “more connected” to the Mass. All of it depends on how one interprets and labels the symbolism. I look forward to what comes next. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment