First, I come before you with biretta in hand, to give praise
where praise is due. I do not think that
a newspaper (or any news outlet) is good only if it agrees with me, but is good
if it informs fairly on all sides. (A
tricky thing to do when you have your own personal beliefs as an editor and you
have to make advertisers happy I realize.)
So after yesterday’s rant, I must offer praise to the Akron Beacon
Journal for printing another Letter to the Editor in today’s edition written by
the Rev. David Durkee, our fair neighbor to the south, that gave a more
thorough view of what took place in Washington D.C. this past week and the
titled it, “A Message of Life.” Kudos to
you. Both.
IN OTHER NEWS:
A while back another article appeared in the paper in which
the author, in a passing way, made reference to Scientology (of Tom Cruise
fame) and said that it was a fraud and an abuse of the laws of this country
that protect religion. That may or may
not be the case (I have no real idea only having a shmattering of an insight about
Scientology.) But we must be careful
about deciding who should be afforded benefit of the law. If they have not broken the law, even if we
very much disagree with them, it is dangerous for us to say, “But they are
undeserving of this law.” That may be
true. But what recourse will we have
then when a large group of people (we see this happening already) decides that
we are unreasonable and that the law written to protect us should not apply to
us?
Said much better, here is some dialogue from “A Man for All
Seasons” in which St. Thomas More is engaged in a conversation with idealistic
young man named Roper who would have another man arrested who has not yet
broken the law. (Wife and Daughter are
More’s)
Speaker
|
Dialog
|
Wife
|
Arrest
him!
|
More
|
For
what?
|
Wife
|
He's
dangerous!
|
Roper
|
For
all we know he's a spy!
|
Daughter
|
Father,
that man's bad!
|
More
|
There's
no law against that!
|
Roper
|
There
is, God's law!
|
More
|
Then
let God arrest him!
|
Wife
|
While
you talk he's gone!
|
More
|
And
go he should, if he were the Devil himself, until he broke the law!
|
Roper
|
So,
now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
|
More
|
Yes!
What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
|
Roper
|
Yes,
I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
|
More
|
Oh?
And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where
would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?
This country is
planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if
you cut them down (and you're just the man to do it!), do you really think
you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?
Yes, I'd give the
Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
|
2 comments:
Good to hear that the Beacon was willing to publish a letter that balanced the bias in their reporting, and better still Fr. Durkee went to the trouble of writing the Beacon!
I found Fr. Durkee's letter on the Beacon website, and he did a great job of characterizing the beauty and power of the event and putting in a plug for goodness and truth!
The Law is fulfilled in Love.
While Cardinal Dolan and Archpishop Lori have sounded the alarm on the immorality of keeping our old health insurance under the new system, Pope Benedict XVI, with the new articles of Canon Law, has given us two very good options: (1) Collaborate with one of the three Protestant health-sharing minsitries, or (2) Form our own "parish-based minsitries."
http://www.sosuchouki.blogspot.com/2013/02/i-will-not-leave-you-orphans-jn-1418.html
Post a Comment