Continuing our look at Lumen
Gentium . . .
Let’s say you belong to a club – say the Slovenian Beneficent
Society.
They purpose of the club is to
raise funds and then give them to worthy causes.
Sounds simple enough.
There is a president, and the usual suspect
of leaders – VP, secretary, treasurer, etc . . . and then there is the main
body of the club.
It could be that the
president and one of his cohorts starts making a lot of decisions concerning
funds that the rest of the group has no say in.
The feel that they do not have power.
They come then to lose interest unless the president starts giving some
if his power to the stake holders of the society.
That is understandable and is the type of view people have
about the Church.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad96/cad960ba0046f50640d02702e8f0057d299966c5" alt=""
There was an article in the paper yesterday about a “controversial
priest” who is coming to Cleveland to speak.
An equally controversial nun said of him, “he is about empowering the
laity.”
This comes from the idea the “Church”
is nothing but the local parish, diocese, and Rome.
But this is only a small part of “Church.”
Church is everything: it is you at your job,
it is literature, it is movies, it is science, it is the billboard at the end
of the block, it is your home, it is what’s playing on your TV, it is what you
spend your spare time doing and your spare resources supporting.
Church is society – Church is culture –
Church is everywhere we bring it.
Hierarchical Church is really a very small part of this.
Faith may inform what one should do in their
bedroom, or at work, or when paying bills, but there is no priest standing over
your shoulder telling you what to do.
He
could tell you what perhaps you should be doing, but he has no power.
That the laity’s freedom, the arena in which
they act as priest, prophet, and king.
The point is this: unlike the Slovenian Beneficent Society,
the totality of the society consists within the meeting of the society and the
officers have usurped the power. The
rest of the group is powerless. That a
clergyman would run a parish and pray the sacraments does not make the laity
powerless outside of that realm. The Church
is much bigger than that. There is far
too much to do. It is really a very
small part that clergy have any kind of control over if Church is properly
understood.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5113/a511377accd05818439344a1b520b5cb5cf2332c" alt=""
By empowering the laity, what many people want is the
clericalization of the laity and the laicizing of the clergy.
There is not to be a distinction in
roles.
Neither should there seem to be
more perceived “power” at the parish by the clergy than by anybody else.
(Of course NOBODY is suggesting the clergy
then should share more in the direct “power” of determining what you do with you
day . . .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a0c/b8a0c24c65a8db766414e34564546ec2c81a1c18" alt=""
Granted . . . clergy has, at time, overstepped their
boundaries and have been too dictatorial at the parish to the parish’s
harm.
Conversely, parishes have been
declericalized at times to the opposite problem.
But what paragraph 32 of
Lumen Gentium is trying to say is that we are all one.
Nobody is more powerful in the Church
(meaning the whole Church – not just institutional Church) than the other.
We are equals but with different roles and
each of us are endowed with roles and responsibilities in each.
We are each equally gifted with grace toward
salvation.
There is only one People of
God springing from
one Lord, one faith,
one baptism, one common dignity, one common vocation toward sanctity, one
salvation, one hope, one call to charity.
True, when human beings enter the equation, this delicate balance
can and does go out of whack, sometimes terribly so, but it the calling – what Christ
gave us to work with. It is our goal and
our ideal. It is what it is to be
Catholic, Christian, and a part of the One, Holy, and Apostolic Church.