Yesterday our computers were down and I was unable to post
before I left for the day. Apparently
Time Warner was down for much of Akron due to a digging incident.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed53/0ed53a1c924ab095db42b2beae493f6c8d94f84a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5466b/5466b2a1af25beb7c25160011ab5bc3e9b93dee7" alt=""
But for Catholics, it is not a matter of the Church keeping
up with the culture. That is a
distinctly Protestant idea. It is much
easier to achieve conformity between culture and religion also when all one has
is the Bible. As the past Episcopal
Archbishop of Washington once said when defending his view on the homosexual
lifestyle, “Don’t argue Scripture with me.
You can make Scripture mean whatever you want.” But for Catholics, we have Tradition to
grapple with also. Tradition helps
interpret Scripture and Scripture helps interpret Tradition. We hold what we believe to be revealed truth
that cannot simply (or complexly) change.
If it was held true in the year 212, it must also be held true as
divinely revealed in the year 2012.
(If you listen to the interview, Gross does point out things
about the Church that have changed and asks if not things like an all male priesthood
could not also change. But what changes
is practice – man made stuff – not theology.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1d57/b1d57217234b975ae33ec02e6647b032bec85bf0" alt=""
To quote Chesterton, “We do not really want a religion that is right where we are right. What we want is a religion that is right where we are wrong . . . They say they want a religion to be social, when they would be social without any religion. They say they want a religion to be practical, when they would be practical without any religion. They say they want a religion acceptable to science, when they would accept the science even if they did not accept the religion. They say they want a religion like this because they are like this already. They say they want it, when they mean that they could do without it.”
3 comments:
I believe in the hereafter. I want to be with God forever. I believe that the Catholic Church offers the best means to make that happen.
rmk
I read the transcript of her interview with Sister Pat Farrell http://www.wbur.org/npr/156858223/an-american-nun-responds-to-vatican-condemnation and they both bemoaned the fact that the Church wasn't keeping up with the times and how oppressed women are and it made me so mad! We are constantly talking about what a bad state the world is in, imagine how beautiful it would be if everyone followed the teachings of the Church!
What I first thought of when I read this is your Marilyn Vos Savant homily. Majority opinion is a very unreliable way to determine what is true. Yet sheep-like beings that we are, we so resist being out of step with the rest of the flock. But to borrow from what mothers have been saying from time immemorial, if the flock is about to jump off a cliff, would we jump with them?
As Peter Kreeft so aptly observes, progressivism dictates that the only kind of snobbery that is still acceptable is chronological snobbery, in which the wisdom of the ages is set aside for the ever-shifting groupthink of today's masses. (See Kreeft's chapter on "Progressivism" in the book Disorientation: How to Go to College Without Losing Your Mind.)
Post a Comment