We are adults. We
know how we want to be treated. We know
by what person we wish to be "ruled." And
so it is very “in” at the moment to say that lay people should have more of
role in the election of a new pope. (Hey! What about us priests and bishops?!) It is a very enticing idea, but nobody is
suggesting exactly how that should or even could be done. It’s easy to say somebody should do something
positive and then give not the slimmest suggesting on how even if (debatably) it
is a good idea.
So say we want everyone to have a vote. I think those who most push for this idea
would be the least pleased with the outcome.
There are over I billion Catholics in the world and the vast majority of
them are now south of the equator where sticking with traditional veins of
Catholicism are much more in practice.
And it is one thing to say that we in the West should get a
vote, but if we do, then those living in the Sahara desert who are Catholic
should get a vote too. And exactly how
would it be carried out? Who would
collect the votes in the Antarctic, China, Zimbabwe, or from persecuted
Christians in Catholic-hostile countries?
How long do we wait to collect them all?
How do we make sure that they are well informed in order to make a good
decision?

What if there is a split in the vote; the west clearly
behind one candidate and the third world (in greater numbers) overwhelmingly
for their candidate? Is this not rife
for division in the Church?

Meantime the west (generally) is less involved, our
attendance at Mass is plummeting, we are more and more in conflict with 2000 years of
consistent Church teaching, and we actively dissuade our young men from
becoming priests. And we want a
vote.
Wow. Among your better pieces, and that is saying something.
ReplyDelete